Friday, January 16, 2026


New York state has released nearly 7,000 known illegal migrant criminals without notifying ICE since President Trump took office — including killers, sexual predators and a maniac booted from the US eight times who attacked an Ithaca cop with a machete, The Post has learned.

The rap sheets behind the rogue’s gallery include 29 homicides, thousands of assaults and hundreds of burglaries, robberies, drug offenses, weapons offenses and sexual predatory offenses, the Department of Homeland Security revealed Monday.

All of them were protected by state and local sanctuary laws that dramatically restrict how local authorities can communicate with ICE, DHS says.



 

Democrats Voted Against Thirteenth Amendment

The reason for that is simple. They supported slavery. Jeffersonian Democrats, also known as Republicans, gathered together in 1792 to form a party of abolitionists opposed to slavery. The party split later into Northern and Southern factions. By 1860, this opposition came to a head. Many Southern Democrats owned slaves and plantations and refused to give freedom to those they held in bondage. Abraham Lincoln formed the Republican Party to oppose the Southern Democrats and their policies. Interestingly enough, some slave owners justified owning slaves because they were giving them a place to live and food to eat. It was as if the slaves could not take care of themselves and they needed their slave masters. Slaves were not permitted to learn to read or write, just one more way to keep them dependent upon their masters. The Democrats of today follow the same pattern. The plantation is now the United States. Government is the slave owner. If the modern day “slaves” are kept dependent upon government to support themselves, they will continue to vote for the Party. Democrats have used this same formula for decades. Most people don’t realize that slavery in this country came from the English. In Britain, slaves were made not only of Africans, but of Irish, Scots, Catholics, or any group who the aristocracy deemed worthy of indenture. In the colonies, this became groups of wealthy landowners who kept slaves for financial reasons; free labor to support their plantations. Some in the United states opposed the practice and wished to abolish it in it’s entirety. Others wanted to abolish it in any new territories west of the original colonies. In any event, there was a political split and the Republican party was founded. Democrats in the years following the founding of the Republican Party opposed not only freedom for slaves, but also opposed women’s suffrage. Some Democrat Presidents not only opposed rights for blacks but openly supported the efforts of the KKK, an action group of the Democratic Party. I believe that today, that function is carried out by groups like Antifa and BLM. The Jim Crow segregation laws were supported and passed by Democrats. Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, passed by Lyndon Johnson, was done only because of the burgeoning power of black voters in his home state of Texas. Democrats still believe in the Plantation model, and since the traditional groups who they’ve fought to control are now waking up to their tactics, they are in search of new “slaves”. I believe that these new people are the illegal immigrants.

 

Votes Against Thirteenth Amendment

 AI Overview     Opposition to the 13th Amendment (abolishing slavery) came from Democrats, some border-state politicians (like from Kentucky, Delaware)

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Lovin’ our Chicken McNuggets more than our unborn babies.

USA Today reported that McDonalds had cut ties with one of its chicken suppliers. This supplier was a contractor with Tyson Foods, the second biggest purchaser of poultry in the US. Tyson’s spokesman said that they were doing an investigation but, “based on what we currently know, we are terminating the farmer’s contract to grow chickens for us.”

So, what happened to cause these two major corporations to take such swift and aggressive action?

Well, an animal rights group called, Mercy for Animals, obtained and shared some gruesome video footage with these corporations that showed what appeared to be the chicken farmer’s employees clubbing small and sickly chickens to death. And, how did this animals rights group get the footage? Well, it was secretly recorded by one of the group’s investigators, who pretended to be a committed employee in order to get hired and stay employed for 4 weeks. Yep. This person went undercover and secretly taped wrongdoing.

Now, what struck me as ironic is how differently this story has been reported compared to the Planned Parenthood story where its employees were secretly recorded negotiating to sell the organs and tissue of aborted babies. Lots of corporations, as well as the federal government, do business with Planned Parenthood and there has certainly not been swift and aggressive action to cut their ties. In fact, the Obama administration increased support and just gave millions more in grants to Planned Parenthood.

Moreover, unlike the Center for Medical Progress that caught Planned Parenthood, there have not been reports or calls to investigate Mercy for Animals because of the tactics that it used to obtain the video footage and no one is defending the chicken farmer. And, no one is saying that they refused to view the graphic footage because the chicken farmer said that they follow the most ethical standards in dealing with sickly chickens. In fact, USA Today, which was extremely slow to cover the Planned Parenthood story and has given it relatively limited coverage given its seriousness, proudly proclaimed in their article that they viewed the “graphic video.”

But, here’s the strangest thing of all. This farmer “grows” these chickens to kill them. But, as a culture””in terms of our collective outrage at evil doing””we care more about what happens to chicken than we do about the unborn, even in death.

Alas, when it comes to how “humanely” we treat our future Chicken McNuggets, we say “I’m lovin it,” but when it comes to ascribing humanity to the unborn in life or death, not so much.

 

Sad News/Personal Commentary

 I watch Spanish Language television. I've been watching N+FORO...I like their brand, their presentation, their style, their approach, among other things. N+FORO is basically Mexico centered & professional in their news coverage. Unfortunately, that's about to change.

I got word on January 13, 2026 that N+FORO is now under the Televisa/Univision umbrella. This change offers people like me less options, more politics, more activism, less accuracy & so on.

My solution to this change is to watch more online news. It may be your solution as well.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

 Henry Fairfield Osborn (1857-1935) Professor at Princeton University and Columbia University 

David Starr Jordan President of Indiana University, 1885-1891, President and then Chancellor of Stanford University, and professor of biology at Butler University

Harry Laughlin Laughlin's work was supported on an international scale. Adolf Hitler and the Nazi regime commended Laughlin on many accounts, primarily for his theory of excluding whole races from naturalization in general. The 1933 Sterilization Laws of Nazi Germany were sculpted after theories Laughlin had explicated in Eugenical Sterilization in the United States. The University of Heidelberg in Heidelberg, Germany, granted Laughlin an honorary master's degree in 1936 for his work.

Margaret Sanger 1939 letter from Sanger to Dr. Clarence Gamble, where she wrote: "We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members".

Clarence J. Gamble taught and did research in medicine and pharmacology at the University of Pennsylvania Medical School, rising to the rank of assistant professor. Taught At Harvard

Louis Agassiz

David Starr Jordan

Georges Cuvier

Francis Galton

Paul Popenoe

Leo Stanley

Barton Warren Evermann served as a professor at Indiana State University, Stanford, Cornell, and Yale

Eugenics


When people think of eugenics, what most often comes to mind is Hitler’s persecution of Jews during World War II, but the American eugenics movement began significantly before, and served as a major inspiration. Modern eugenics emerged in the 1880s, with the goal of improving people’s genetic character by promoting reproduction by those with suitable characteristics and keeping those deemed unfit from reproducing, warning the unfit would otherwise bring down the entire world. 

Experts at the time decided that the largest threat was “feeble minded” individuals, which included those with low intelligence, immoral behavioral habits, mental health conditions, and more. They supposedly were increasing in number rapidly, leading 12 states to pass sterilization laws by 1913.

In Michigan, Dr. John Harvey Kellogg was a leader of the eugenics movement, perceiving it as the only way to save society from disaster. To promote this, Kellogg organized the First National Conference on Race Betterment, held from January 8-12, 1913, at the Battle Creek Sanitarium, which included more than 400 eugenics experts from across the country. 

To encourage public involvement and support, the conference held “mental and physical perfection contests,” where children and babies were given tests and evaluations for rankings, with the winners receiving medals. The schedule was also published in newspapers, and thousands attended the conference. 

The core of the conference was a presentation by Harry Laughlin titled “Calculations on the Working Out of a Proposed Program of Sterilization.” He claimed that 15 million sterilizations would be necessary to save the country, as the lowest ten percent of humans were so meagerly endowed that their reproduction constituted a social menace. Laughlin described specific strategies for effective programs, since current regulations were too weak.

To further inspire the public to take action on preventing the reproduction of the “feeble minded,” Kellogg wrote a paper titled “Needed – a New Human Race,” where he encouraged all people to become involved in eugenics. This included positive eugenics, where citizens deemed to have beneficial traits were encouraged to have large families. 

Kellogg’s eugenics support impacted education in Michigan. Colleges began to offer or even require eugenics courses for students. Due largely to close proximity, Battle Creek College defined race betterment through eugenics as the primary and essential job of the college, and all students and staff were expected to support and promote it.

Michigan was the first state to propose eugenical sterilization in 1897, although the first sterilization law in the state did not pass until 1923. This law, upheld in court multiple times, led to 3,786 officially documented sterilizations. Seventy-six percent of these were on people deemed mentally deficient, 11% were people considered insane, and the other 13% were sexual deviants, people with epilepsy, or “moral degenerates.” African Americans and poor people were the main targets.

In the 1920s, selective breeding through eugenics became an American craze, based largely on the concept of race suicide. This theory posited that middle and upper class white people—the perceived superior race—were being outbred by all other races, and would die out if action was not taken. 

In 1924 eugenics reached the Supreme Court with the case Buck v. Bell. Carrie Buck was the perfect subject, a member of a family with a large number of “feeble minded” individuals who had given birth out of wedlock. Almost all the evidence presented by the prosecution was false, and the defense did not make any effort to challenge the charges made; the goal of all parties involved was for a eugenical sterilization act to be passed. Virginia’s Ecumenical Sterilization Act was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court by a vote of 8-1. The decision relied heavily on Jacobson v. Massachusetts, a case ruling that children needed a smallpox vaccine, with claims that sterilization was a similar issue—it was necessary to protect the health of the country.

Carrie Buck became the first person sterilized in Virginia under the new law. Many states added or updated eugenic sterilization laws after the case, and by January 1935, 21,539 forced sterilizations had occurred across the country. Thirty-three states had statutes at some point in time that overall led to more than 60,000 involuntary sterilizations. The main force ending the movement in America was the association with Nazi Germany. Madison Grant, a prominent American eugenics supporter, even received a letter from Hitler, in which he proclaimed Grant’s book The Passing of the Great Race to be his bible. America did not want to be linked to the Nazis, so support for eugenics waned. However, the Buck v. Bell decision has never actually been overturned, and involuntary sterilizations still occur on rare instances, and they are perfectly legal. Understanding the history of eugenics in the United States is important, and can help us be more vigilant in ensuring that a similar movement does not start in the future. 

Elizabeth Stout is a Master of Public Health student in the Health Behavior and Health Education Department at the University of Michigan School of Public Health. She is dedicated to providing support and acting as an advocate for people with disabilities, which is promoted by her personal experience as a disabled individual. Outside of college, she acts as a consultant for multiple health organizations, and enjoys spending time surrounded by nature and playing piano.